ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Corticospinal Tract Sparing in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disruptions in the brain's connections to the hands resulting from a cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) can lead to severe and persistent functional impairments. The integrity of these connections is an important predictor of upper extremity recovery in stroke and may similarly act as a biomarker in cSCI. In this perspective article, we review recent findings from a large cohort of individuals with cSCI, demonstrating the predictive value of corticospinal tract (CST) integrity in cSCI-CST sparing. This research underscores that, akin to stroke, the integrity of brain-to-hand connections is crucial for predicting upper extremity recovery following cSCI. We address the limitations of commonly used metrics, such as sacral sparing and the concept of central cord syndrome. Furthermore, we offer insights on emerging metrics, such as tissue bridges, emphasizing their potential in assessing the integrity of brain connections to the spinal cord.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.