ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Dystocia, Delivery, and Artificial Intelligence in Labor Management: Perspectives and Future Directions.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory Non-invasive Estimation of Cervical Dilation from Electrohysterography and Maternal Data: A Machine-Learning Proof-of-Concept Study.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) for Risk Stratification of Occiput Posterior Fetal Head Position.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- From Retrospective to Prospective: The Contribution of Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm in Understanding and Preventing Dystocia in Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- The Contribution of AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) to Cesarean Section Within Robson Classification Group.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) as a Decision Support System in Transverse Fetal Head Position.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Labor management remains a critical issue in obstetrics, with dystocic labor presenting significant challenges in both management and outcomes. Recent advancements in intrapartum ultrasound have facilitated substantial progress in monitoring labor progression. This paper explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into obstetric care, focusing on the Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) for assessing spatial dystocia during labor. The AIDA utilizes intrapartum ultrasonography to measure four geometric parameters: the angle of progression, the degree of asynclitism, the head-symphysis distance, and the midline angle. These measurements are analyzed using machine learning techniques to predict delivery outcomes and stratify risk. The AIDA classification system categorizes labor events into five classes, providing a nuanced assessment of labor progression. This approach offers several potential advantages, including objective assessment of fetal position, earlier detection of malpositions, and improved risk stratification, placing labor events within a broader context of labor dystocia and obstetric care and discussing their potential impact on clinical practice. This paper serves as a more comprehensive overview and discussion of the AIDA approach, its implications, perspectives, and future directions. However, challenges such as the technological requirements, training needs, and integration with clinical workflows are also addressed. This study emphasizes the necessity for additional validation across diverse populations and careful consideration of its ethical implications. The AIDA represents a significant advancement in applying AI to intrapartum care, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and improving outcomes in cases of suspected dystocia. This paper explicates the key methodological approaches underpinning the AIDA, illustrating the integration of artificial intelligence and clinical expertise. The innovative framework presented offers a paradigm for similar endeavors in other medical specialties, potentially catalyzing advancements in AI-assisted healthcare beyond obstetrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.