Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518549›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Dystocia, Delivery, and Artificial Intelligence in Labor Management: Perspectives and Future Directions.

Antonio Malvasi, Lorenzo E Malgieri, Michael Stark, Andrea Tinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonio MalvasiUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Lorenzo E MalgieriChief Innovation Officer in CLE, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0606-6425
Michael StarkThe New European Surgical Academy (NESA), 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-9506
Andrea TinelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CERICSAL (CEntro di RIcerca Clinico SALentino), Veris delli Ponti Hospital Scorrano, 73020 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8426-8490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Labor management remains a critical issue in obstetrics, with dystocic labor presenting significant challenges in both management and outcomes. Recent advancements in intrapartum ultrasound have facilitated substantial progress in monitoring labor progression. This paper explores the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into obstetric care, focusing on the Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm (AIDA) for assessing spatial dystocia during labor. The AIDA utilizes intrapartum ultrasonography to measure four geometric parameters: the angle of progression, the degree of asynclitism, the head-symphysis distance, and the midline angle. These measurements are analyzed using machine learning techniques to predict delivery outcomes and stratify risk. The AIDA classification system categorizes labor events into five classes, providing a nuanced assessment of labor progression. This approach offers several potential advantages, including objective assessment of fetal position, earlier detection of malpositions, and improved risk stratification, placing labor events within a broader context of labor dystocia and obstetric care and discussing their potential impact on clinical practice. This paper serves as a more comprehensive overview and discussion of the AIDA approach, its implications, perspectives, and future directions. However, challenges such as the technological requirements, training needs, and integration with clinical workflows are also addressed. This study emphasizes the necessity for additional validation across diverse populations and careful consideration of its ethical implications. The AIDA represents a significant advancement in applying AI to intrapartum care, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making and improving outcomes in cases of suspected dystocia. This paper explicates the key methodological approaches underpinning the AIDA, illustrating the integration of artificial intelligence and clinical expertise. The innovative framework presented offers a paradigm for similar endeavors in other medical specialties, potentially catalyzing advancements in AI-assisted healthcare beyond obstetrics.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecesarean sectioncomplicationdystociaintrapartum ultrasoundmedical–legal claimsobstetrics malpracticeobstructed laboroperative deliveryprolonged labor

Identifiers

PMID39518549
PMCPMC11546974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.