ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Evaluating Fitness in Older Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: Balancing Therapy and Treatment Risks.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the suitability of older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation remains a long-standing challenge. Geriatric assessment, which involves the evaluation of multiple dimensions of health, may influence a patient's ability to tolerate intensive or mild-intensity approaches, including treatment-related mortality. Prospective studies are required to validate different fitness criteria, in addition to making it possible to compare the effectiveness of geriatric assessment-based fitness against other criteria, in order to identify which aspects of geriatric assessment are linked to treatment tolerance. It is hoped that validation studies will include different groups of patients receiving either intensive or lower-intensity chemotherapy. At a minimum, geriatric assessment should involve the measurement of the comorbidity burden, cognition, physical function, and emotional health-factors previously associated with mortality in AML. These assessments should be conducted before starting chemotherapy in order to minimize the treatment's impact on the results. While treatment tolerance has traditionally been evaluated through toxicity rates in solid tumor patients, AML treatment often results in high toxicity rates regardless of the intensity. Therefore, early mortality should be the primary endpoint for assessing treatment tolerance, given its significant and clear implications. Other important endpoints might include declines in functional status and quality of life and treatment adjustments or discontinuation due to toxicity. Validating these fitness criteria is essential for guiding treatment choices, improving supportive care, determining trial eligibility, interpreting study outcomes, and informing drug labeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.