ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Efficacy and Safety of Cardioband in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Arm Trials and Observational Studies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcatheter tricuspid valve treatment: a growing armamentarium of devices.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Annuloplasty with the Cardioband System: A Step-by-Step Guide.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions to Manage Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- The Reconstructed Individual Patient Data from Kaplan-Meier (IPDfromKM) Method for Non-Inferiority Analyses: A New Potential Application.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation-avoid surgery, consider transcatheter intervention in patients with significant symptoms, treat atrial fibrillation.Porto biomedical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.