ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Early Postoperative Outcomes of the Direct Superior Approach versus the Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe direct superior approach (DSA) is a tissue-sparing alternative to the traditional posterior approach (PA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially offering improved recovery and fewer complications. This study compares perioperative parameters, radiological and functional outcomes, and complications between the DSA and the PA in primary THA.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus. Studies comparing the DSA and the PA in primary THA were included based on predefined criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. Statistical analyses included calculating standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test, I2 statistics, and sensitivity analyses.
resultsOut of 126 identified articles, 10 studies were included, which encompassed 28,063 patients (DSA: 1464; PA: 26,599). Significant advantages of the DSA over the PA were observed in blood loss (SMD -0.26,
conclusionsThe DSA offers significant perioperative advantages over the PA, including reduced blood loss, transfusion rates, LOS, incision length, and improved early functional recovery with higher discharge to home rates. Comparable complication rates and radiological outcomes support the DSA's safety and efficacy for quicker recovery in THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.