ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Delayed Diagnosis and Misdiagnosis of Lacrimal Sac Tumors in Patients Presenting with Epiphora: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lacrimal Sac and Nasolacrimal Duct Tumors Mimicking Chronic Inflammation: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Giant Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Lacrimal Sac Initially Suspected to Represent a Sinonasal Malignancy 16 Years After Dacryocystorhinostomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Nasolacrimal Duct Presenting Without Hemolacria: A Case Report and Literature Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Malignant Lacrimal Sac Tumours-Review of the Literature and Report of Own Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesEpiphora, or excessive tearing, is a common symptom often attributed to benign conditions such as dry eye or nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, it can also be an early indicator of lacrimal sac tumors, which are frequently misdiagnosed or diagnosed late due to their subtle presentation. This study aims to identify the clinical features that contribute to delays and misdiagnoses of lacrimal sac tumors in patients presenting with epiphora, with the goal of improving early detection and treatment outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study reviewed medical records from Taipei Veterans General Hospital between 2007 and 2023, focusing on patients who presented with epiphora and were later diagnosed with pathologically confirmed lacrimal sac tumors. Inclusion criteria were limited to cases that were initially misdiagnosed or had a delayed diagnosis, with imaging and clinical evaluations confirming tumor-related tear drainage obstruction. Patients with non-tumor causes of epiphora were excluded.
resultsEleven cases of lacrimal sac tumors were identified, including two benign and nine malignant tumors. The average duration from symptom onset to diagnosis was 22.4 months. Common symptoms included epiphora (100%), discharge (54.5%), and hemolacria (18.2%). Subtle clinical signs, such as asymmetry in the medial canthal region and non-tender swelling, were frequently noted. Despite receiving appropriate surgical and adjuvant treatments, the impact of delayed diagnosis was significant. Two patients succumbed to tumor-related disease; one developed lung metastasis 12 years after diagnosis, and another experienced recurrence during a six-year follow-up after undergoing extensive exenteration, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.
conclusionsLacrimal sac tumors can present insidiously with symptoms often mistaken for benign conditions, leading to significant diagnostic delays. Thorough history taking, meticulous physical examination, and timely imaging are crucial for early detection. Increased clinician awareness and a high index of suspicion for lacrimal sac tumors in patients with atypical epiphora are essential to improve prognosis and reduce the risk of severe outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.