ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Validation of Inter-Reader Agreement/Consistency for Quantification of Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Sub-RPE Compartmental Features Across Retinal Diseases.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Structure-Function Link of Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Outer Retinal Features with Visual Acuity in Dry AMD.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Measurement Techniques for Photoreceptor Loss in Geographic Atrophy.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- CLEAR report 1: a scoping review and meta-analysis for definitions, imaging metrics, and functional correlates of photoreceptor integrity in AMD.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea Accelerates Progression of Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Three-Year Prospective Cohort Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Differential Visual Outcomes in Neovascular AMD Based on Ellipsoid Zone Integrity and Fluid Presence: Insights from a Phase III Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn unmet need exists when clinically assessing retinal and layer-based features of retinal diseases. Therefore, quantification of retinal-layer-thicknesses/fluid volumes using deep-learning-augmented platforms to reproduce human-obtained clinical measurements is needed.
methodsIn this analysis, 210 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) scans (30 without pathology, 60 dry age-related macular degeneration [AMD], 60 wet AMD, and 60 diabetic macular edema [total 23,625 B-scans]) were included. A fully automated segmentation platform segmented four retinal layers for compartmental assessment (internal limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone [EZ], retinal pigment epithelium [RPE], and Bruch's membrane). Two certified OCT readers independently completed manual segmentation and B-scan level validation of automated segmentation, with segmentation correction when needed (semi-automated). Certified reader metrics were compared to gold standard metrics using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to assess overall agreement. Across different diseases, several metrics generated from automated segmentations approached or matched human readers performance.
resultsAbsolute ICCs for retinal mean thickness measurements showed excellent agreement (range 0.980-0.999) across four cohorts. EZ-RPE thickness values and sub-RPE compartment ICCs demonstrated excellent agreement (ranges of 0.953-0.987 and 0.944-0.997, respectively) for full dataset, dry-AMD, and wet-AMD cohorts.
conclusionsAnalyses demonstrated high reliability and consistency of segmentation of outer retinal compartmental features using a completely human/manual approach or a semi-automated approach to segmentation. These results support the critical role that measuring features, such as photoreceptor preservation through EZ integrity, in future clinical trials may optimize clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.