Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518306›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Energy Consumption Prediction of Injection Molding Process Based on Rolling Learning Informer Model.

Jianfeng Huang, Yi Li, Xinyuan Li, Yucheng Ding, Fenglian Hong, Shitong Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianfeng HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2610-6722
Yi LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Xinyuan LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Yucheng DingDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Fenglian HongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Shitong PengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-8985

Funding

Guangdong Science and Technology In-novation Strategy STKJ202209065Shantou University NTF20019Shantou University NTF23037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate energy consumption prediction in the injection molding process is crucial for optimizing energy efficiency in polymer processing. Traditional parameter optimization methods face challenges in achieving optimal energy prediction due to complex energy transmission. In this study, a data-driven approach based on the Rolling Learning Informer model is proposed to enhance the accuracy and adaptability of energy consumption forecasting. The Informer model addresses the limitations of long-sequence prediction with sparse attention mechanisms, self-attention distillation, and generative decoder techniques. Rolling learning prediction is incorporated to enable continuous updating of the model to reflect new data trends. Experimental results demonstrate that the RL-Informer model achieves a normalized root mean square error of 0.1301, a root mean square error of 0.0758, a mean absolute error of 0.0562, and a coefficient of determination of 0.9831 in energy consumption forecasting, outperforming other counterpart models like Gated Recurrent Unit, Temporal Convolutional Networks, Long Short-Term Memory, and two variants of the pure Informer models without Rolling Learning. It is of great potential for practical engineering applications.

Indexed as

data-drivenenergy consumption predictiongreen manufacturinginjection molding processRL-Informer

Identifiers

PMID39518306
PMCPMC11548335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.