ArticlePolymers2024
Energy Consumption Prediction of Injection Molding Process Based on Rolling Learning Informer Model.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate energy consumption prediction in the injection molding process is crucial for optimizing energy efficiency in polymer processing. Traditional parameter optimization methods face challenges in achieving optimal energy prediction due to complex energy transmission. In this study, a data-driven approach based on the Rolling Learning Informer model is proposed to enhance the accuracy and adaptability of energy consumption forecasting. The Informer model addresses the limitations of long-sequence prediction with sparse attention mechanisms, self-attention distillation, and generative decoder techniques. Rolling learning prediction is incorporated to enable continuous updating of the model to reflect new data trends. Experimental results demonstrate that the RL-Informer model achieves a normalized root mean square error of 0.1301, a root mean square error of 0.0758, a mean absolute error of 0.0562, and a coefficient of determination of 0.9831 in energy consumption forecasting, outperforming other counterpart models like Gated Recurrent Unit, Temporal Convolutional Networks, Long Short-Term Memory, and two variants of the pure Informer models without Rolling Learning. It is of great potential for practical engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.