Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518279›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

A New Method for Compression Testing of Reinforced Polymers.

Ciprian Ionuț Morăraș, Dorin Husaru, Viorel Goanță, Paul Doru Bârsănescu, Fabian Cezar Lupu, Corneliu Munteanu, Nicanor Cimpoesu, Elena Roxana Cosau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ciprian Ionuț MorărașMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6300-2255
Dorin HusaruFluid Mechanics, Fluid Machines and Fluid Power Systems Department, Machine Manufacturing and Industrial Management Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Viorel GoanțăMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-5076
Paul Doru BârsănescuMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Fabian Cezar LupuMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Corneliu MunteanuMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-9129
Nicanor CimpoesuDepartment of Materials Science, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 41 Dimitrie Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iasi, Romania.
Elena Roxana CosauMechanical Engineering, Mechatronics and Robotics Department, Mechanical Engineering Faculty, "Gheorghe Asachi" Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressive testing of specimens taken from relatively thin composite plates is difficult, especially due to the occurrence of buckling. To prevent buckling, the central portion of the specimens used for the compression test has smaller dimensions, and the specimens can be guided along their entire length. For these reasons, optical methods, such as digital image correlation (DIC), cannot be used for the compression test and strain rosettes cannot be glued onto the samples to determine Poisson's ratio. In this study, compression tests of a glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) were conducted using both the ASTM D695 (Boeing version) and a newly proposed method. The new method involves using special specimens that allow T-type rosettes to be bonded to determine Poisson's ratio, whose value of 0.14 was thus determined. SEM images of the failure surfaces were presented and interpreted. A finite element analysis (FEA) of the specimens tested in compression is also presented. The first analyzed case considers the homogeneous and orthotropic composite, loaded with a uniformly distributed force. The normal stress in the central section of the specimen, determined with FEA, has an error of 6.52% compared to that determined experimentally. Additionally, the strain in the center of the strain gauge, determined with FEA, has an error of 4.76% compared to the measured one. In the second case studied with FEA, the sample is loaded with a quasi-concentrated force, which can move in the direction of the symmetry axes of the cross-section, to study the effect of the eccentricity of the compression force on the state of stress. It was shown that the eccentricity of the force has a great influence: the stress distribution in the section of the specimen becomes strongly non-uniform. For a force eccentricity of 0.4 mm in the direction of the OX axis, the minimum stress decreases by 53.7%, and the maximum stress increases by 55.4%. In order to analyze the influence of some manufacturing defects, two other cases were analyzed by FEA, in which it was assumed that the thicknesses of the outer resin layers were modified, making them asymmetrical. For this final FEA, the specimen was considered to be composed of laminates. These results demonstrate the special attention that must be paid to the centric application of force in compression testing.

Indexed as

composite materialcompression testFEAforce eccentricityGFRPPoisson’s ratioSEM analysis

Identifiers

PMID39518279
PMCPMC11548657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.