ArticlePolymers2024
Low-Velocity Impact Resistance and Compression After Impact Strength of Thermoplastic Nanofiber Toughened Carbon/Epoxy Composites with Different Layups.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Cu-BTC-Modified Carbon Fiber on Interfacial and Mechanical Properties of Polyethylene Matrix Composites.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Hybrid Polymeric Woven Composites: Mechanical Performance, Numerical Simulation, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Relationship Between Hardness and Impact Strength of Epoxy-Glass Composites Modified with Carbonisate from MDF Pyrolysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of CNT Filler in Polymer Matrix on Impact Damage Propagation in the Volume of Carbon Fiber Laminates.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of polyether block amide (PEBA) thermoplastic elastomeric nanofibers in reducing low-velocity impact damage across three carbon fiber composite lay-up configurations: a cross-ply [0°/90°]2s (CP) and a quasi-isotropic [0°/45°/90°/-45°]s (QI) lay-up utilizing unidirectional plies, and a stacked woven [(0°,90°)]4s (W) lay-up using twill woven fabric plies. The flexural strength and interlaminar shear strength of the composites remained unaffected by the addition of nanofibers: around 750 MPa and 63 MPa for CP, 550 MPa and 58 MPa for QI, and 650 MPa and 50 MPa for W, respectively. The incorporation of nanofibers in the interlaminar regions resulted in a substantial reduction in projected damage area, ranging from 30% to 50% reduction over an impact energy range of 5-20 J. Microscopic analysis showed that especially the delamination damage decreased in toughened composites, while intralaminar damage remained similar for the cross-ply and quasi-isotropic lay-ups and decreased only in the woven lay-up. This agrees with the broad body of research that shows that interleaved nanofibers result in a higher delamination resistance due to toughening mechanisms related to nanofiber bridging of cracks. Despite their ability to mitigate delamination during impact, nanofibers showed limited positive effects on Compression After Impact (CAI) strength in quasi-isotropic and cross-ply composites. Interestingly, only the woven fabric composites demonstrated improved CAI strength, with a 12% improvement on average over the impact energy range, attributed to a reduction in both interlaminar and intralaminar damage. This study indicates the critical role of fiber integrity over delamination size in determining CAI performance, suggesting that the delaminations are not sufficiently large to induce buckling of sub-layers, thereby minimizing the effect of nanofiber toughening on the CAI strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.