ArticlePolymers2024
Mechanical Strength of Additive Manufactured and Standard Polymeric Components Joined Through Structural Adhesives.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main aim of this work is to evaluate the mechanical properties of additive manufactured polymeric parts joined with standard plastic parts through structural adhesives. The primary advantage of this technique is its ability to significantly increase the size of the final assembly by using additive manufacturing (AM) for complex joints and inexpensive, reliable extruded plastic parts for load-bearing components. This hybrid assembly combines the flexibility and shape adaptability of AM with the structural strength and cost-effectiveness of extruded polymer parts, resulting in a final design that performs comparably to the base material. The materials used in the paper are rigid acrylic adhesive and toughened acrylic, both applicable with almost no surface preparation and fast curing. The 3D-printed parts are produced in ABS, while the standard parts are in PVC. First, the work is devoted to estimating the performance of the adhesives using pin-collar joints and a combined numerical and experimental methodology. The second section presents and discusses the results of two more realistic applications of adhesive bonding to hybrid complex joints. For the pin-collar joints, the results show failure mostly in the adhesive, with an average shear stress of 11.5 MPa and 5.22 MPa and a stiffness of 4449 N/mm and 3649 N/mm for the rigid and toughened adhesives, respectively. The results of the adhesive bonding of structural joints show that the adhesive is always capable of providing the load-carrying capacity required to achieve the strength of traditionally manufactured polymeric parts. The paper shows that adhesives are a feasible way to expand the potential of 3D-printed equipment to obtain larger hybrid parts partially realized with traditional technology, especially with inexpensive off-the-shelf bars and sections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.