ArticlePolymers2024
Poly(HEMA-co-MMA) Hydrogel Scaffold for Tissue Engineering with Controllable Morphology and Mechanical Properties Through Self-Assembly.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dynamic modelling of liver-bone axis: A microphysiological approach to hepatic osteodystrophy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Toward Cartilage-Mimicking Biomaterials: Biotribological, Biochemical and Structural Evaluation of pHEMA and PVA-Based Hydrogels.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Dynamic Hydrogels in Breast Tumor Models.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) has been widely used in medical materials for several decades. However, the poor mechanical properties of this material have limited its application in the field of tissue engineering. The purpose of this study was to fabricate a scaffold with suitable mechanical properties and in vitro cell responses for soft tissue by using poly(HEMA-co-MMA) with various concentration ratios of hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA). To customize the concentration ratio of HEMA and MMA, the characteristics of the fabricated scaffold with various concentration ratios were investigated through structural morphology, FT-IR, mechanical property, and contact angle analyses. Moreover, in vitro cell responses were observed according to the various concentration ratios of HEMA and MMA. Consequently, various morphologies and pore sizes were observed by changing the HEMA and MMA ratio. The mechanical properties and contact angle of the fabricated scaffolds were measured according to the HEMA and MMA concentration ratio. The results were as follows: compressive maximum stress: 254.24-932.42 KPa; tensile maximum stress: 4.37-30.64 KPa; compressive modulus: 16.14-38.80 KPa; tensile modulus: 0.5-2 KPa; and contact angle: 36.89-74.74°. In terms of the in vitro cell response, the suitable cell adhesion and proliferation of human dermal fibroblast (HDF) cells were observed in the whole scaffold. Therefore, a synthetic hydrogel scaffold with enhanced mechanical properties and suitable fibroblast cell responses could be easily fabricated for use with soft tissue using a specific HEMA and MMA concentration ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.