ArticlePolymers2024
Micro-Macro Coupling Study on the Mechanical Properties of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a key and weak point of continuous fiber-reinforced composites (CFRCs), the interface between the fiber and the matrix is vulnerable to failure under external loads, with its performance directly affecting the overall properties of CFRCs. Hence, a micro-macro coupling method that considered the microscopic properties of the interface was utilized to analyze and predict the mechanical properties of CFRCs more accurately. The microscopic mechanical parameters of the fiber-matrix interface, which were obtained using molecular dynamics, were transferred to the representative volume element (RVE). The stiffness matrix of the CFRC, required for the macroscopic finite element model, was then calculated using a unified periodic homogenization method based on the RVE and assigned to the finite element model for a macroscopic simulation. Nylon/continuous carbon fiber specimens were fabricated through additive manufacturing, with the tensile and bending strengths of the specimens obtained through tensile and three-point bending tests. The tensile strength of the experimental specimen was 200.1 MPa, while the result of the simulation containing the interface was 205.5 MPa, indicating a difference of less than 5% between the two. In contrast, the result of the simulation without an interface was 317.7 MPa, representing a high error of 58.7% compared with the experimental results. Moreover, the bending strength, Young's modulus, and flexural modulus results with and without an interface showed the same trend as that for the tensile strength. This illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed micro-macro coupling method for analyzing and predicting the mechanical properties of CFRCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.