Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518204›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

A Comprehensive Review on the Tribological Evaluation of Polyether Ether Ketone Pristine and Composite Coatings.

Amal A Seenath, M M A Baig, Jitendra Kumar Katiyar, Abdul Samad Mohammed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amal A SeenathDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
M M A BaigDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-4882
Jitendra Kumar KatiyarCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-9484
Abdul Samad MohammedDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2508-8198

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer coatings have gained a lot of attention in the recent past because of their ability to be easily coated on complex shapes, their low cost, and their ability to reduce friction as compared to other materials. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) is one such high-performance polymer that has gained significant attention in recent years due to its exceptional mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and thermal stability making it a prominent candidate for applications in industries. However, PEEK in its pristine form exhibits poor wear resistance with a moderate coefficient of friction (0.30-0.38). Many attempts have been made by several researchers to improve its wear resistance and lower the COF by developing composite coatings. Hence, in this review, we aim to summarize and present in detail the tribological evaluation of pristine PEEK and PEEK composite coatings by discussing the various methods adopted by the researchers to improve the properties of PEEK, the different types of reinforcements and various dispersion techniques used to develop PEEK composite coatings. By consolidating and analyzing the existing body of knowledge, we also aim to offer valuable insights into the development of more durable, high-performance PEEK nanocomposite coatings for a broad range of tribological applications.

Indexed as

coatingscompositesfrictionPEEKwear

Identifiers

PMID39518204
PMCPMC11548446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.