Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518198›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Leveraging Spruce Bark Particle Morphology for Enhanced Internal Bonding in Particleboard Production.

Jakob Gößwald, Marius Cătălin Barbu, Eugenia Mariana Tudor, Pavel Král

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob GößwaldFaculty for Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-2227
Marius Cătălin BarbuDesign and Green Engineering Department, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Markt 136a, 5431 Kuchl, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0622-6038
Eugenia Mariana TudorDesign and Green Engineering Department, Salzburg University of Applied Sciences, Markt 136a, 5431 Kuchl, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-5893
Pavel KrálFaculty for Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7466-5185

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous rise in global demand for wood products has led to an increase in prices and a surge in research into alternative resources. As a byproduct of the timber industry, bark has emerged as a promising supplement in particleboard (PB) production. However, its anatomical structure, the presence of extractives, and its inferior mechanical properties complicate the production process, which have not yet been fully overcome at a commercial scale. This study proposes a paradigm shift, advocating for separate and specialized bark constituent processing in a wet state. Three bark-based raw materials-namely, outer bark particles, bark fiber clumps, and bark fibers-were investigated under varying wood content scenarios. PBs with a target density of 0.7 g/cm

Indexed as

bark fiberslarchouter barkparticleboardspruce

Identifiers

PMID39518198
PMCPMC11548537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.