Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518196›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Detecting Multi-Scale Defects in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review of Challenges and Advanced Non-Destructive Testing Techniques.

Demeke Abay Ashebir, Andreas Hendlmeier, Michelle Dunn, Reza Arablouei, Stepan V Lomov, Adriano Di Pietro, Mostafa Nikzad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Demeke Abay AshebirSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-9938
Andreas HendlmeierAerostructures Innovation Research Hub (AIR Hub), Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-1692
Michelle DunnSchool of Science, Computing and Engineering Technologies, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1089-6870
Reza ArabloueiData61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Pullenvale, QLD 4069, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6932-2900
Stepan V LomovDepartment of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-4913
Adriano Di PietroAerostructures Innovation Research Hub (AIR Hub), Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Mostafa NikzadSchool of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) defects present significant challenges in fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (FRTPCs), directly impacting both their structural and non-structural performance. In structures produced through material extrusion-based AM, specifically fused filament fabrication (FFF), the layer-by-layer deposition can introduce defects such as porosity (up to 10-15% in some cases), delamination, voids, fiber misalignment, and incomplete fusion between layers. These defects compromise mechanical properties, leading to reduction of up to 30% in tensile strength and, in some cases, up to 20% in fatigue life, severely diminishing the composite's overall performance and structural integrity. Conventional non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques often struggle to detect such multi-scale defects efficiently, especially when resolution, penetration depth, or material heterogeneity pose challenges. This review critically examines manufacturing defects in FRTPCs, classifying FFF-induced defects based on morphology, location, and size. Advanced NDT techniques, such as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), which is capable of detecting voids smaller than 10 µm, and structural health monitoring (SHM) systems integrated with self-sensing fibers, are discussed. The role of machine-learning (ML) algorithms in enhancing the sensitivity and reliability of NDT methods is also highlighted, showing that ML integration can improve defect detection by up to 25-30% compared to traditional NDT techniques. Finally, the potential of self-reporting FRTPCs, equipped with continuous fibers for real-time defect detection and in situ SHM, is investigated. By integrating ML-enhanced NDT with self-reporting FRTPCs, the accuracy and efficiency of defect detection can be significantly improved, fostering broader adoption of AM in aerospace applications by enabling the production of more reliable, defect-minimized FRTPC components.

Indexed as

continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplasticsmachine learningmanufacturing defectsnon-destructive testingself-reportingstructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39518196
PMCPMC11548215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.