ReviewPolymers2024
Detecting Multi-Scale Defects in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Fiber-Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review of Challenges and Advanced Non-Destructive Testing Techniques.
Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fiber-Matrix Interface Engineering in Polymer Composites: Linking Surface Chemistry to Multiscale Mechanical Performance.Polymers · 2026Review
- Residual Stresses and Distortion in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing of Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites: A Review.Polymers · 2026Review
- Impact of Layer Thickness on Mechanical Properties and Surface Roughness of FDM-Printed Carbon Fiber-PEEK Composite.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- YOLO-AMI: enhancing online quality monitoring in 3D printing with composite loss and parameter-free attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Microstructure and Mechanical Performance of 3D-Printed Carbon Fibre-PLA-PHA Composites.Polymers · 2026Article
- Polymer Composites in Additive Manufacturing: Current Technologies, Applications, and Emerging Trends.Polymers · 2026Review
- Acoustic Emission Mechanisms During Polymer Processing and Chain Orientation: From Amorphous to Crystalline.Polymers · 2025Review
- Recent Highlights in Polymer Analysis and Characterization.Polymers · 2025Article
- Development of novel filament production setup of continuous fiber reinforced composite filament for additive manufacturing applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Trends in Non-Destructive Testing Approaches for Composite Materials: A Review of Successful Implementations.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Experimental Study and ANN Development for Modeling Tensile and Surface Quality of Fiber-Reinforced Nylon Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Nanosilica as a Toughening Agent for Enhanced Epoxy Composites for Aerospace Applications.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Polymer Analysis and Characterization.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) defects present significant challenges in fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites (FRTPCs), directly impacting both their structural and non-structural performance. In structures produced through material extrusion-based AM, specifically fused filament fabrication (FFF), the layer-by-layer deposition can introduce defects such as porosity (up to 10-15% in some cases), delamination, voids, fiber misalignment, and incomplete fusion between layers. These defects compromise mechanical properties, leading to reduction of up to 30% in tensile strength and, in some cases, up to 20% in fatigue life, severely diminishing the composite's overall performance and structural integrity. Conventional non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques often struggle to detect such multi-scale defects efficiently, especially when resolution, penetration depth, or material heterogeneity pose challenges. This review critically examines manufacturing defects in FRTPCs, classifying FFF-induced defects based on morphology, location, and size. Advanced NDT techniques, such as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), which is capable of detecting voids smaller than 10 µm, and structural health monitoring (SHM) systems integrated with self-sensing fibers, are discussed. The role of machine-learning (ML) algorithms in enhancing the sensitivity and reliability of NDT methods is also highlighted, showing that ML integration can improve defect detection by up to 25-30% compared to traditional NDT techniques. Finally, the potential of self-reporting FRTPCs, equipped with continuous fibers for real-time defect detection and in situ SHM, is investigated. By integrating ML-enhanced NDT with self-reporting FRTPCs, the accuracy and efficiency of defect detection can be significantly improved, fostering broader adoption of AM in aerospace applications by enabling the production of more reliable, defect-minimized FRTPC components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.