Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518113›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mexico: Data from the Can.Prost Mexican Registry and a Project for Early Detection.

Miguel Angel Jimenez Rios, Anna Scavuzzo, Nancy Reynoso Noverón, Caleb García Arango, Ivan Calvo Vazquez, Alonso Hurtado Vázquez, Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodriguez, Miguel Angel Jimenez Davila, Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Bernardo Rocco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miguel Angel Jimenez RiosDepartment of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, UNAM-Univesidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Anna ScavuzzoDepartment of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, UNAM-Univesidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9558-8086
Nancy Reynoso NoverónDepartment of Epidemiology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Caleb García ArangoDepartment of Epidemiology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Ivan Calvo VazquezDepartment of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, UNAM-Univesidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Alonso Hurtado VázquezOpus Campaign, Department of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Oscar Gerardo Arrieta RodriguezInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Miguel Angel Jimenez DavilaDepartment of Urology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, UNAM-Univesidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Maria Chiara SighinolfiASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, 20147 Milan, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoFondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpidemiological data are crucial for adopting primary and secondary prevention strategies and to develop screening protocols against prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the comprehensive characterization of PCa across White and Black men, there is a lack of data from the Mexican population. This manuscript presents data from the Can.Prost registry that captures PCa trends over the past two decades in Mexico City; furthermore, we aimed to compare clinical differences and oncological outcomes before and after the promotion of early detection actions through a campaign against PCa that occurred in 2014.

methodsA retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed Mexican PCa patients was carried out at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan) in Mexico City. During 2014 and 2015, a project for the early diagnosis of PCa ("OPUS program") was launched in the aforementioned tertiary hospital. Starting at the age of 45 years, all men were invited for a PSA measurement and a specialist urologist consultation. All individuals with clinical or biochemical suspicion of PCa (PSA > 4 ng/mL), in the context of age and prostate volume, underwent ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Then, patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer were stratified according to the year of diagnosis: Group A accounted for those diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 and Group B for those patients diagnosed in the timeframe of 2015-2021. Comparisons of PCa characteristics, treatment modalities and oncologic outcomes between Group A and B were performed.

resultsOverall, we collected data from 2759 PCa patients from 2000 to 2021. The median PSA at baseline was 32 ng/mL, and 25% had a family history of PCa. Overall, 25.8% were asymptomatic and 46% had a non-metastatic presentation. After the OPUS campaign, PSA at diagnosis was significantly lower across all age groups. The incidence of PCa diagnosis in asymptomatic men was higher (31.4% vs. 19.9%) and a higher proportion of men were diagnosed with organ-confined, palpable disease (46% vs. 28%) (

conclusionsPCa in Mexican patients displays aggressive features at diagnosis, whereas the rate of non-significant disease is negligible. The introduction of early detection strategies may lead to lower symptomatic and metastatic PCa and higher opportunities for radical treatment. This emphasizes the need for public awareness and for adjustment of screening strategies to the peculiarities of the Mexican population.

Indexed as

aggressive featuresearly diagnosislethal cancerprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39518113
PMCPMC11544922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.