ReviewCancers2024
Histology Agnostic Drug Development: An Updated Review.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Assessment of Perceived Knowledge and Beliefs Toward Cancer Immunotherapy Among Regional Healthcare Providers.Cureus · 2026Article
- Towards the Prediction of Responses to Cancer Immunotherapy: A Multi-Omics Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genomics of uterine malignancies and the potential of precision medicine.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in oncology have led to the development of histology-agnostic therapies, which target genetic alterations irrespective of the tumor's tissue of origin. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the current state of histology-agnostic drug development, focusing on key therapies, including pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, entrectinib, dostarlimab, dabrafenib plus trametinib, selpercatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and reprotrectinib. We performed a detailed analysis of each therapy's mechanism of action, clinical trial outcomes, and associated biomarkers. The review further explores challenges in drug resistance, such as adaptive signaling pathways and neoantigen variability, as well as diagnostic limitations in identifying optimal patient populations. While these therapies have demonstrated efficacy in various malignancies, significant hurdles remain, including intratumoral heterogeneity and resistance mechanisms that diminish treatment effectiveness. We propose considerations for refining trial designs and emerging biomarkers, such as tumor neoantigen burden, to enhance patient selection. These findings illustrate the transformative potential of histology-agnostic therapies in precision oncology but highlight the need for continued research to optimize their use and overcome existing barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.