Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39518001›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Molecular Genetic Factors of Risk Stratification of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Aida Gilyadova, Anton Ishchenko, Julietta Babayan, Max Avin, Marina Sekacheva, Igor Reshetov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aida GilyadovaFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University Named after. I. M. Sechenov Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4343-4813
Anton IshchenkoNational Medical Research Center Treatment and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Russia.
Julietta BabayanFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University Named after. I. M. Sechenov Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Max AvinFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University Named after. I. M. Sechenov Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 119435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0008-8689-4557
Marina SekachevaFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University Named after. I. M. Sechenov Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 119435 Moscow, Russia.
Igor ReshetovFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education First Moscow State Medical University Named after. I. M. Sechenov Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 119435 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to epidemiological studies, endometrial carcinoma is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies of the female reproductive system, with an increasing incidence. Currently, the risk stratification of this neoplasm takes into account the stage, degree of tumor differentiation, histological type and depth of myometrial invasion. Since the publication of the last International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer in 2009, numerous reports have appeared on the molecular characteristics of different types of endometrial carcinoma. Taking this into account, the FIGO Committee determined in 2023 that changes and updates to the staging system are justified to reflect new information about this tumor. Due to the high prevalence of the disease and mortality from endometrial cancer, an in-depth study of the molecular genetic characteristics of tumor cells is relevant; the results of such studies can be used to improve the efficiency of diagnosis, assess the risk of metastasis and prognosis of the disease. Lymph node assessment is crucial for the choice of treatment strategy for endometrial cancer, since metastatic lymph node involvement is one of the main factors affecting prognosis. At the same time, the criteria for the appropriateness of lymphadenectomy in low-differentiated malignant tumors are not clearly defined. Various molecular methods have been proposed to assess the status of lymph nodes; candidate genes are being studied as potential diagnostic biomarkers, as well as microRNA. The aim of the study was to analyze the literature data on numerous studies of molecular risk factors for progression in endometrioid carcinoma, as well as to preserve the most important marker changes in relation to the prognostic development of this disease.

methodsA literature review was conducted using data from the electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Wiley Cochrane Library for the period from 2018 to 2023 using the specific keywords.

resultsThe current scientific genetic studies on metastasis and prognostic factors in uterine cancer were analyzed, and a systematization of the reviewed data from the modern literature was done.

conclusionsTo select the most effective treatment - intraoperative, adjuvant or combination therapy, minimize postoperative risks of lymphadenectomy and clearly predict the results - further study of the molecular genetic features of endometrial cancer is necessary.

Indexed as

DNA methylationendometrial cancerendometrial carcinomagenetic profilinglymphadenectomymedical–genetic factorsmicroRNA expressionsentinel lymph nodetumor marker

Identifiers

PMID39518001
PMCPMC11545318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.