ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluating MIR and NIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate Analysis for Detection and Quantification of Additives in Tobacco Products.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infrared Spectroscopy for Variety Identification and Authenticity Analysis of Tobacco Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Volatile Profiling and Variety Discrimination of Leather Using GC-IMS Coupled with Chemometric Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection and quantification of additives in tobacco products are critical for ensuring consumer safety and compliance with regulatory standards. Traditional analytical techniques, like gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and others, although effective, suffer from drawbacks, including complex sample preparation, high costs, lengthy analysis times, and the requirement for skilled operators. This study addresses these challenges by evaluating the efficacy of mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy and near-IR (NIR) spectroscopy, coupled with multivariate analysis, as potential solutions for the detection and quantification of additives in tobacco products. So, a representative set of tobacco products was selected and spiked with the targeted additives, namely caffeine, menthol, glycerol, and cocoa. Multivariate analysis of MIR and NIR spectra consisted of principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) to classify samples based on targeted additives. Based on the unsupervised techniques (PCA and HCA), a distinction could be made between spiked and non-spiked samples for all four targeted additives based on both MIR and NIR spectral data. During supervised analysis, SIMCA achieved 87-100% classification accuracy for the different additives and for both spectroscopic techniques. PLS-DA models showed classification rates of 80% to 100%, also demonstrating robust performance. Regression studies, using PLS, showed that it is possible to effectively estimate the concentration levels of the targeted molecules. The results also highlight the necessity of optimizing data pretreatment for accurate quantification of the target additives. Overall, NIR spectroscopy combined with SIMCA provided the most accurate and robust classification models for all target molecules, indicating that it is the most effective single technique for this type of analysis. MIR, on the other hand, showed the overall best performance for quantitative estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.