Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517913›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluating MIR and NIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate Analysis for Detection and Quantification of Additives in Tobacco Products.

Zeb Akhtar, Michaël Canfyn, Céline Vanhee, Cédric Delporte, Erwin Adams, Eric Deconinck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeb AkhtarScientific Direction Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Service of Medicines and Health Products, Sciensano, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Michaël CanfynScientific Direction Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Service of Medicines and Health Products, Sciensano, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Céline VanheeScientific Direction Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Service of Medicines and Health Products, Sciensano, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-3706
Cédric DelporteRD3-Pharmacognosy, Bioanalysis and Drug Discovery Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Bld Triomphe, Campus Plaine, CP 205/5, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7453-7028
Erwin AdamsDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Pharmaceutical Analysis, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, O&N2, PB 923, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-2989
Eric DeconinckScientific Direction Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Service of Medicines and Health Products, Sciensano, Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6980-6684

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and quantification of additives in tobacco products are critical for ensuring consumer safety and compliance with regulatory standards. Traditional analytical techniques, like gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and others, although effective, suffer from drawbacks, including complex sample preparation, high costs, lengthy analysis times, and the requirement for skilled operators. This study addresses these challenges by evaluating the efficacy of mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy and near-IR (NIR) spectroscopy, coupled with multivariate analysis, as potential solutions for the detection and quantification of additives in tobacco products. So, a representative set of tobacco products was selected and spiked with the targeted additives, namely caffeine, menthol, glycerol, and cocoa. Multivariate analysis of MIR and NIR spectra consisted of principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) to classify samples based on targeted additives. Based on the unsupervised techniques (PCA and HCA), a distinction could be made between spiked and non-spiked samples for all four targeted additives based on both MIR and NIR spectral data. During supervised analysis, SIMCA achieved 87-100% classification accuracy for the different additives and for both spectroscopic techniques. PLS-DA models showed classification rates of 80% to 100%, also demonstrating robust performance. Regression studies, using PLS, showed that it is possible to effectively estimate the concentration levels of the targeted molecules. The results also highlight the necessity of optimizing data pretreatment for accurate quantification of the target additives. Overall, NIR spectroscopy combined with SIMCA provided the most accurate and robust classification models for all target molecules, indicating that it is the most effective single technique for this type of analysis. MIR, on the other hand, showed the overall best performance for quantitative estimation.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredTobacco ProductsCaffeineCluster AnalysisDiscriminant AnalysisGlycerolLeast-Squares AnalysisMentholMultivariate AnalysisCaffeineGlycerolMentholdata analysisMIR/NIR spectroscopymultivariate calibration techniquestobacco products

Identifiers

PMID39517913
PMCPMC11548177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.