Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517909›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automatic Apple Detection and Counting with AD-YOLO and MR-SORT.

Xueliang Yang, Yapeng Gao, Mengyu Yin, Haifang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xueliang YangCollege of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China.
Yapeng GaoCollege of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China.
Mengyu YinCollege of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China.
Haifang LiCollege of Computer Science and Technology (College of Data Science), Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong 030600, China.

Funding

CentralGuided Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Shanxi Province YDZJSX2021C005CentralGuided Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Shanxi Province YDZJSX2022A016Shanxi Province Key R\&D Program Projects 2022ZDYF128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the production management of agriculture, accurate fruit counting plays a vital role in the orchard yield estimation and appropriate production decisions. Although recent tracking-by-detection algorithms have emerged as a promising fruit-counting method, they still cannot completely avoid fruit occlusion and light variations in complex orchard environments, and it is difficult to realize automatic and accurate apple counting. In this paper, a video-based multiple-object tracking method, MR-SORT (Multiple Rematching SORT), is proposed based on the improved YOLOv8 and BoT-SORT. First, we propose the AD-YOLO model, which aims to reduce the number of incorrect detections during object tracking. In the YOLOv8s backbone network, an Omni-dimensional Dynamic Convolution (ODConv) module is used to extract local feature information and enhance the model's ability better; a Global Attention Mechanism (GAM) is introduced to improve the detection ability of a foreground object (apple) in the whole image; a Soft Spatial Pyramid Pooling Layer (SSPPL) is designed to reduce the feature information dispersion and increase the sensory field of the network. Then, the improved BoT-SORT algorithm is proposed by fusing the verification mechanism, SURF feature descriptors, and the Vector of Local Aggregate Descriptors (VLAD) algorithm, which can match apples more accurately in adjacent video frames and reduce the probability of ID switching in the tracking process. The results show that the mAP metrics of the proposed AD-YOLO model are 3.1% higher than those of the YOLOv8 model, reaching 96.4%. The improved tracking algorithm has 297 fewer ID switches, which is 35.6% less than the original algorithm. The multiple-object tracking accuracy of the improved algorithm reached 85.6%, and the average counting error was reduced to 0.07. The coefficient of determination R2 between the ground truth and the predicted value reached 0.98. The above metrics show that our method can give more accurate counting results for apples and even other types of fruit.

Indexed as

appearance featuresapple countingBoT-SORTmultiple-object trackingYOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID39517909
PMCPMC11548465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.