Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517862›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Decoding Brain Signals from Rapid-Event EEG for Visual Analysis Using Deep Learning.

Madiha Rehman, Humaira Anwer, Helena Garay, Josep Alemany-Iturriaga, Isabel De la Torre Díez, Hafeez Ur Rehman Siddiqui, Saleem Ullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madiha RehmanInstitute of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-7258
Humaira AnwerInstitute of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.
Helena GarayUniversidad Europea del Atlantico, Isabel Torres 21, 39011 Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0101-4781
Josep Alemany-IturriagaUniversidad de La Romana, Edificio G&G, C/Héctor René Gil, Esquina C/Francisco Castillo Marquez, La Romana 22000, Dominican Republic.ORCID 0009-0009-9872-3082
Isabel De la Torre DíezDepartment of Signal Theory, Communications and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-7720
Hafeez Ur Rehman SiddiquiInstitute of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-2060
Saleem UllahInstitute of Computer Science, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3747-1263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception and recognition of objects around us empower environmental interaction. Harnessing the brain's signals to achieve this objective has consistently posed difficulties. Researchers are exploring whether the poor accuracy in this field is a result of the design of the temporal stimulation (block versus rapid event) or the inherent complexity of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Decoding perceptive signal responses in subjects has become increasingly complex due to high noise levels and the complex nature of brain activities. EEG signals have high temporal resolution and are non-stationary signals, i.e., their mean and variance vary overtime. This study aims to develop a deep learning model for the decoding of subjects' responses to rapid-event visual stimuli and highlights the major factors that contribute to low accuracy in the EEG visual classification task.The proposed multi-class, multi-channel model integrates feature fusion to handle complex, non-stationary signals. This model is applied to the largest publicly available EEG dataset for visual classification consisting of 40 object classes, with 1000 images in each class. Contemporary state-of-the-art studies in this area investigating a large number of object classes have achieved a maximum accuracy of 17.6%. In contrast, our approach, which integrates Multi-Class, Multi-Channel Feature Fusion (MCCFF), achieves a classification accuracy of 33.17% for 40 classes. These results demonstrate the potential of EEG signals in advancing EEG visual classification and offering potential for future applications in visual machine models.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningElectroencephalographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionBCIblock designEEGrapid-event designvisual classification

Identifiers

PMID39517862
PMCPMC11548637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.