ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Review of Indoor Localization Methods Leveraging Smartphone Sensors and Spatial Context.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Posterior-Contact Soft-ZUPT for Foot-Mounted Inertial Navigation: Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-Observation Modeling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimized Intelligent Localization Through Mathematical Modeling and Crow Search Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Classification of User Behavior Patterns for Indoor Navigation Problem.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As Location-Based Services (LBSs) rapidly develop, indoor localization technology is garnering significant attention as a critical component. Smartphones have become tools for indoor localization due to their highly integrated sensors, fast-evolving computational capabilities, and widespread user adoption. With the rapid advancement of smartphones, methods for smartphone-based indoor localization have increasingly attracted attention. Although there are reviews on indoor localization, there is still a lack of systematic reviews focused on smartphone-based indoor localization methods. In particular, existing reviews have not systematically analyzed smartphone-based indoor localization methods or considered the combination of smartphone sensor data with prior knowledge of the indoor environment to enhance localization performance. In this study, through systematic retrieval and analysis, the existing research was first categorized into three types to dissect the strengths and weaknesses based on the types of data sources integrated, i.e., single sensor data sources, multi-sensor data fusion, and the combination of spatial context with sensor data. Then, four key issues are discussed and the research gaps in this field are summarized. Finally, a comprehensive conclusion is provided. This paper offers a systematic reference for research and technological applications related to smartphone-based indoor localization methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.