Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517847›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability.

Timo Eppig, Manuel Seer, Antonio Martinez-Abad, Virgilio Galvis, Saskia Schütz, Alejandro Tello, Michiel C Rombach, Jorge L Alió

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timo EppigInstitute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-6239
Manuel SeerAMIPLANT GmbH, 91220 Schnaittach, Germany.
Antonio Martinez-AbadVissum Grupo Miranza, 03016 Alicante, Spain.
Virgilio GalvisCentro Oftalmologico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca 681004, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4587-5364
Saskia SchützAMIPLANT GmbH, 91220 Schnaittach, Germany.
Alejandro TelloCentro Oftalmologico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca 681004, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5081-0720
Michiel C RombachAKKOLENS International b.v., 4836 BA Breda, The Netherlands.
Jorge L AlióVissum Grupo Miranza, 03016 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-1751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of sulcus-to-sulcus measurements has been challenging due to the limitations of current approaches. Ultrasound methods are highly operator-dependent and require extensive training, while traditional optical devices cannot visualize structures posterior to the iris. However, modern optical anterior segment coherence tomography (AS-OCT) devices are changing this paradigm by identifying some anatomical landmarks posterior to the iris. This study evaluates the reproducibility of optical sulcus measurements in the context of sizing a novel accommodative intraocular lens (IOL). Preoperative OCT scans of patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed regarding the dimensions of the ciliary sulcus using a custom scan method with a clinically available anterior segment optical coherence tomographer. Measurements were compared between two different readers, and various derived parameters were compared. The measurements by both readers were highly correlated (R

Indexed as

Tomography, Optical CoherenceAgedCataract ExtractionCiliary BodyFemaleHumansLenses, IntraocularMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsintraocular lensocular dimensionsoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID39517847
PMCPMC11548583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.