Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517790›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Two-Phase Globally Coupled Low-Density Parity Check Decoding Aided with Early Termination and Forced Convergence.

Kun Zhu, Hongwen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kun ZhuSchool of Electronic Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing, Anqing Normal University, Anqing 246003, China.
Hongwen YangSchool of Information and Communication, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7541-8474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance the decoding efficiency of Globally Coupled (GC) LDPC codes, we incorporated Early Termination (ET) and Forced Convergence (FC) into the local/global two-phase decoding algorithm to expedite the decoding process. The two-phase decoding scheme integrates the ET technique to halt unnecessary iterations in the local decoding phase while employing the FC technique to accelerate convergence in the global phase decoding. The application of ET technology in the local decoding of GC-LDPC codes will not cause performance loss as in traditional block codes and will cause considerable complexity gains. For a longer code length and larger convergence differences between nodes' global codes, the FC technique operates more efficiently in global code than local code. Two variants are proposed for the ET scheme in the local decoding, namely ET-1 and ET-2. The initial variant, ET-1, predicts whether local decoding can be successful according to data characteristics and stop the local decoding iteration that is not expected to be successful in time. In the case of ET-2, the saved local iterations are transformed to global decoding equally. The results show that ET-1 saves considerable decoding time complexity and ET-2 improves the performance of the GC-LDPC code with the same decoding time complexity. The combined approach of ET-1 with FC reduces the decoding time complexity up to 42% at a low Signal Noise Rate region while maintaining its performance; ET-2-FC two-phase decoding saves approximately 25% decoding time complexity while improving the BER by about 0.18 dB and FER by about 0.23 dB.

Indexed as

early terminationforce convergenceglobally coupled LDPC codelocal/global two-phase decodinglow complexity

Identifiers

PMID39517790
PMCPMC11548602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.