Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517787›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Breast Lesion Detection for Ultrasound Images Using MaskFormer.

Aashna Anand, Seungho Jung, Sukhan Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aashna AnandHigh School, Korea International School, Seongnam 13543, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0000-3614-0855
Seungho JungDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-6664-4217
Sukhan LeeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT 2019-0-00421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of the MaskFormer model for segmenting and classifying breast lesions using ultrasound images, addressing ultrasound's limitations. Ultrasound used for breast cancer detection faces challenges like low image contrast and difficulty in the detection of small or multiple lesions, further complicated by variability based on operator skill. Initial experiments with U-Net and other CNN-based models revealed constraints, such as early plateauing in model loss, which indicated suboptimal learning and performance. In contrast, MaskFormer demonstrated continuous improvement, achieving higher precision in breast lesion segmentation and significantly reducing both false positives and false negatives. Comparative analysis showed MaskFormer's superior performance, with the highest precision and recall rates for malignant lesions and an overall mean average precision (mAP) of 0.943. The model's ability to detect a diverse range of breast lesions, including those potentially missed by the human eye, especially by less experienced practitioners, underscores its potential. These findings suggest that integrating AI models like MaskFormer could greatly enhance ultrasound performance for breast cancer detection, providing reliable, operator-independent image analysis and potentially improving patient outcomes on a global scale.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBreastFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Mammarybenignbreast lesiondeep learningmalignantMaskFormerultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39517787
PMCPMC11548047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.