Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517723›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessment of Physiological Signals from Photoplethysmography Sensors Compared to an Electrocardiogram Sensor: A Validation Study in Daily Life.

Rana Zia Ur Rehman, Meenakshi Chatterjee, Nikolay V Manyakov, Melina Daans, Amanda Jackson, Andrea O'Brisky, Tacie Telesky, Sophie Smets, Pieter-Jan Berghmans, Dongyan Yang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rana Zia Ur RehmanJanssen Research & Development, Buckinghamshire HP12 4EG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-7455
Meenakshi ChatterjeeJanssen Research & Development, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-8962
Nikolay V ManyakovJanssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9037-1400
Melina DaansJanssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Amanda JacksonJanssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Andrea O'BriskyJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
Tacie TeleskyJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
Sophie SmetsJanssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0004-1261-0962
Pieter-Jan BerghmansJanssen Research & Development, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Dongyan YangJanssen Research & Development, LLC, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Elena ReynosoJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
Molly V LucasJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7824-2219
Yanran HuoJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ 08560, USA.
Vasanth T ThirugnanamJanssen Research & Development, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Tommaso MansiJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ 08560, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-4110
Mark MorrisJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearables with photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors are being increasingly used in clinical research as a non-invasive, inexpensive method for remote monitoring of physiological health. Ensuring the accuracy and reliability of PPG-derived measurements is critical, as inaccuracies can impact research findings and clinical decisions. This paper systematically compares heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) measures from PPG against an electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor in free-living settings. Two devices with PPG and one device with an ECG sensor were worn by 25 healthy volunteers for 10 days. PPG-derived HR and HRV showed reasonable accuracy and reliability, particularly during sleep, with mean absolute error < 1 beat for HR and 6-15 ms for HRV. The relative error of HRV estimated from PPG varied with activity type and was higher than during the resting state by 14-51%. The accuracy of HR/HRV was impacted by the proportion of usable data, body posture, and epoch length. The multi-scale peak and trough detection algorithm demonstrated superior performance in detecting beats from PPG signals, with an F1 score of 89% during sleep. The study demonstrates the trade-offs of utilizing PPG measurements for remote monitoring in daily life and identifies optimal use conditions by recommending enhancements.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyHeart RatePhotoplethysmographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicReproducibility of ResultsWearable Electronic DevicesYoung Adultautonomic nervous systembeat detectionECGheart rateheart rate variabilitymulti-scale peak and trough detection algorithmPPGpulse ratepulse rate variabilityremote monitoringwearables

Identifiers

PMID39517723
PMCPMC11548599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.