ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Condition Monitoring Using a Latent Space of Variational Autoencoder Trained Only on a Healthy Machine.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupled Graph Attention Modeling and Anomaly Traceability Method for Multisystem Coupling in SLM Equipment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spatio-Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection in Complex Industrial Processes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning generative models have opened up a new perspective for automated machine diagnostics. These methods improve decision-making by extracting features, classifying, and creating new observations using deep neural networks. Generative modeling aims to determine the joint distribution of input data. This contrasts traditional methods used in diagnostics based on discriminative models and the conditional probability distribution of the target variable at known feature values. In the variational autoencoder (VAE) algorithms trained by the authors, the parameters of diagnostic features are random variables, the distributions of which can be approximated based on data, and the identification of probability distributions is based on variational inference. Variational inference is a tool that deals with difficult statistical problems and is usually faster than classical methods. VAEs can detect anomalies, predict failures, and optimize processes. This paper proposes an unsupervised approach to fault diagnosis using only healthy data with automatic feature extraction from the continuous probabilistic latent subspace of the VAE encoder and reduction in PCA or t-SNE. The solution, verified in the example of simulation data, is a response to a common problem related to the lack or difficulty of obtaining marked data in defected states of devices and mechanical structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.