ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Computer Vision-Driven Movement Annotations to Advance fNIRS Pre-Processing Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is beneficial for studying brain activity in naturalistic settings due to its tolerance for movement. However, residual motion artifacts still compromise fNIRS data quality and might lead to spurious results. Although some motion artifact correction algorithms have been proposed in the literature, their development and accurate evaluation have been challenged by the lack of ground truth information. This is because ground truth information is time- and labor-intensive to manually annotate. This work investigates the feasibility and reliability of a deep learning computer vision (CV) approach for automated detection and annotation of head movements from video recordings. Fifteen participants performed controlled head movements across three main rotational axes (head up/down, head left/right, bend left/right) at two speeds (fast and slow), and in different ways (half, complete, repeated movement). Sessions were video recorded and head movement information was obtained using a CV approach. A 1-dimensional UNet model (1D-UNet) that detects head movements from head orientation signals extracted via a pre-trained model (SynergyNet) was implemented. Movements were manually annotated as a ground truth for model evaluation. The model's performance was evaluated using the Jaccard index. The model showed comparable performance between the training and test sets (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.