Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517712›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Resting-State Electroencephalogram Depression Diagnosis Based on Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis.

Haijun Lin, Jing Fang, Junpeng Zhang, Xuhui Zhang, Weiying Piao, Yukun Liu

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haijun LinHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Jing FangHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Junpeng ZhangHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Xuhui ZhangHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Weiying PiaoHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.
Yukun LiuHeilongjiang Province Key Laboratory of Laser Spectroscopy Technology and Application, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province LH2022F028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is increasing at an alarming rate, underscoring the urgent need for timely and accurate diagnoses to facilitate effective interventions and treatments. Electroencephalography remains a widely used neuroimaging technique in psychiatry, due to its non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness. With the rise of computational psychiatry, the integration of EEG with artificial intelligence has yielded remarkable results in diagnosing depression. This review offers a comparative analysis of two predominant methodologies in research: traditional machine learning and deep learning methods. Furthermore, this review addresses key challenges in current research and suggests potential solutions. These insights aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy for depression and also foster further development in the area of computational psychiatry.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectroencephalographyMachine LearningMajor Depressive DisorderBrainHumansartificial intelligencedeep learningmajor depressive disorderresting-state electroencephalographytraditional machine learning

Identifiers

PMID39517712
PMCPMC11548331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.