ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Massive Point Cloud Processing for Efficient Construction Quality Inspection and Control.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficiency Evaluation of Sampling Density for Indoor Building LiDAR Point-Cloud Segmentation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction of large-scale civil infrastructures requires massive spatiotemporal data to support the management and control of scheduling, quality control, and safety monitoring. Existing artificial-intelligence-based data processing algorithms rely heavily on experienced engineers to adjust the parameters of data processing, which is inefficient and time-consuming when dealing with huge datasets. Limited studies have compared the performance of different algorithms on a unified dataset. This study proposes a framework and evaluation system for comparing different data processing policies for processing huge spatiotemporal data in construction quality control. The proposed method compares the combination of multiple types of algorithms involved in the processing of massive point cloud data. The performance of data processing strategies is evaluated through this framework, and the optimal point cloud processing strategies are explored based on registration accuracy and data fidelity. Results show that a reasonable choice of combinations of point cloud sampling, filtering, and registration algorithms can significantly improve the efficiency of point cloud data processing and satisfy engineering demands for data accuracy and completeness. The proposed method can be applied to the civil engineering problem of processing a large amount of point cloud data and selecting the optimal processing method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.