ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improved Speech Authenticity Detection in Chinese-English Bilingual Contexts.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid evolution of voice technology has heightened the need for robust detection systems to distinguish between authentic and tampered speech. Recent competitions have significantly advanced the development of countermeasures against spoofing attacks. However, while advancements in detection technologies have been notable, existing methods often focus on a single type of tampering and language. Our contribution lies in developing an improved model that integrates an enhanced ResNet architecture with an LSTM to improve the detection of tampered audio, particularly in challenging multilingual scenarios. In the experiments, we built a hybrid dataset from self-recording Chinese speech and public VCTK2 English samples, enhanced the ResNet model generalization capabilities, and evaluated our approach using the bilingual dataset. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves a superior performance with an equal error rate of 11.62%, even in the face of bilingual conditions, and, more importantly, outperforms the leading models from ASVSpoof 2021 and ADD 2022 competitions. We also employed advanced tampering techniques, including CycleGAN voice conversion and auto splicing, to simulate real-world tampering scenarios and verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.