ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Vision-Based Localization Method for Picking Points in Tea-Harvesting Robots.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impedance Control Method for Tea-Picking Robotic Dexterous Hand Based on WOA-KAN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- TBF-YOLOv8n: A Lightweight Tea Bud Detection Model Based on YOLOv8n Improvements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Adaptive Step RRT*-Based Method for Path Planning of Tea-Picking Robotic Arm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the issue of accurately recognizing and locating picking points for tea-picking robots in unstructured environments, a visual positioning method based on RGB-D information fusion is proposed. First, an improved T-YOLOv8n model is proposed, which improves detection and segmentation performance across multi-scale scenes through network architecture and loss function optimizations. In the far-view test set, the detection accuracy of tea buds reached 80.8%; for the near-view test set, the mAP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.