Review of the Anti-

Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek, Patrycja Kula, Grzegorz Chladek

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

New antifungal and less toxic zwitterionic derivatives of 26-membered polyene antibiotic - pimaricin containingJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
Article
Plant-Derived Modifiers for Antimicrobial Soft Denture Liners: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
Review
Effect of Luteolin Nanoparticles on Bond Strength, Hardness, and Roughness of Tissue Conditioners: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Izabela Barszczewska-RybarekDepartment of Physical Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, Strzody 9 Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2708-1854

Patrycja KulaDepartment of Physical Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, Strzody 9 Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.

Grzegorz ChladekMaterials Research Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8282-4131

Funding

Silesian University of Technology 04/040/BKM24/0289

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examined the current state of knowledge on the modifications of commercial soft lining materials (SLMs) with a variety of antifungal compounds: (i) polyene antibiotics, including nystatin and amphotericin B, (ii) azole drugs, including fluconazole, itraconazole, clotrimazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole, and (iii) antiseptics, including chlorhexidine salts to give them anti-

Indexed as

antifungal propertiesazole drugsCandida albicanschlorhexidine saltsmechanical propertiespolyene antibioticssoft lining materials

Identifiers

PMID39517657

DOI10.3390/ma17215383

PMCPMC11547545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.