ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Design of Shape Forming Elements for Architected Composites via Bayesian Optimization and Genetic Algorithms: A Concept Evaluation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image Matching Algorithm-Driven Multi-Beam Customized Meta-Device.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of Shape-Forming Elements on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties in Coextruded Thermoplastic Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
- A Co-extrusion Additive Manufacturing Process with Mixer Nozzle to Dynamically Control Blowing Agent Content and Print Functionally Graded Foams.ACS applied engineering materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article presents the first use of shape forming elements (SFEs) to produce architected composites from multiple materials in an extrusion process. Each SFE contains a matrix of flow channels connecting input and output ports, where materials are routed between corresponding ports. The mathematical operations of rotation and shifting are described, and design automation is explored using Bayesian optimization and genetic algorithms to select fifty or more parameters for minimizing two objective functions. The first objective aims to match a target cross-section by minimizing the pixel-by-pixel error, which is weighted with the structural similarity index (SSIM). The second objective seeks to maximize information content by minimizing the SSIM relative to a white image. Satisfactory designs are achieved with better objective function values observed in rectangular rather than square flow channels. Validation extrusion of modeling clay demonstrates that while SFEs impose complex material transformations, they do not achieve the material distributions predicted by the digital model. Using the SSIM for results comparison, initial stages yielded SSIM values near 0.8 between design and simulation, indicating a good initial match. However, the control of material processing tended to decline with successive SFE processing with the SSIM of the extruded output dropping to 0.023 relative to the design intent. Flow simulations more closely replicated the observed structures with SSIM values around 0.4 but also failed to predict the intended cross-sections. The evaluation highlights the need for advanced modeling techniques to enhance the predictive accuracy and functionality of SFEs for biomedical, energy storage, and structural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.