ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Relationship Between the Elastic Properties and Pain Pressure Threshold in Cesarean Scar Tissue-An Observational Study.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From mechanics to mobilization: a biomechanically-informed rehabilitation framework for cesarean-related scars.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Immediate Changes in the Elasticity of Tissue and the Pain Pressure Threshold in Cesarean Scar Tissue After a Vacuum Intervention: An Open Clinical Trial.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- The Effect of Osteopathic Visceral Manipulation on Quality of Life and Postural Stability in Women with Endometriosis and Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Non-Controlled Before-After Clinical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesCesarean section (C-section) scars can lead to chronic pain due to changes in tissue properties. Combining elastography and algometry can assess these scars comprehensively by identifying areas of increased rigidity and quantifying pain sensitivity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using elastography and algometry together to assess cesarean scar tissue, correlating tissue stiffness with pain thresholds for targeted pain management.
methodsThirty-one non-pregnant women who had undergone a C-section between six months and two years prior participated. Elastography measured tissue stiffness, while algometry provided quantitative measures of pain sensitivity on and around the scar. The correlation between tissue stiffness and pain thresholds was analyzed.
resultsElastography identified areas of increased rigidity within the scar tissue, which corresponded with lower pain thresholds measured by algometry, indicating higher pain sensitivity. A significant correlation was found between increased tissue stiffness and reduced pain thresholds (
conclusionsCombining elastography and algometry offers a powerful diagnostic tool for evaluating C-section scars. This approach identifies areas that may benefit from targeted pain management interventions, enhancing understanding and treatment of pain associated with cesarean scars. Incorporating these techniques into clinical practice could improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.