ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Quarantine Experience-Based Differences in Factors Associated with Depression Among Koreans During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe strict preventive measures implemented globally during the COVID-19 pandemic affected mental health, with most countries reporting a rise in depression and suicide. This study examined factors affecting depression among Korean adults based on quarantine experiences during 2020 and identified key areas for mental health support.
methodsData were obtained from South Korea's 2020 Community Health Survey. Responses from 219,228 adults (1893 with quarantine experience and 217,335 without) to questions about quarantine experience, depression (Korean version of PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or a response of 'several days' or more on item 9), and individual/environmental factors were analyzed. Complex sampling analysis, including descriptive statistics and logistic regression, was conducted using SPSS 29.0.
resultsThis study found that 158 (weighted 7.5%) of those with quarantine experience, and 12,833 (weighted 5.8%) without quarantine experience, reported depression. Regardless of quarantine, being female, having a low income, a history of depression, and increased stress were associated with a higher depression rate, while good subjective health was linked to lower depression rates. Smoking, living-alone, and a lack of sleep among non-quarantined individuals were linked to increased depression risk, while adequate physical activity was linked to reduced risk. Interestingly, alcohol consumption and being overweight (BMI 23-<25) were associated with lower depression rates. Environmental factors, like unmet medical needs and reduced daily activity, were linked to increased depression. Strong social support and social distancing adherence were associated with reduced depression.
conclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions considering quarantine experiences to reduce depression during pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.