ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluating Muscle Mass Changes in Critically Ill Patients: Rehabilitation Outcomes Measured by Ultrasound and Bioelectrical Impedance.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound assessment of muscle atrophy and its association with functional outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Short-Term Biceps Muscle Wasting Assessed by Serial Ultrasound as a Predictor of Survival Duration in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The Prospective Applications of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Postpartum Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Mapping the research landscape and evolving hotspots of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a dual-database bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe loss of muscle mass is common in critically ill patients and is associated with poor prognosis, and efforts have been made to mitigate muscle loss through rehabilitation. This study aimed to evaluate changes in muscle mass in critically ill patients following rehabilitation.
methodsWe enrolled 53 patients expected to stay in the ICU for more than 7 days, dividing them into rehabilitation (15 patients) and no rehabilitation groups (38 patients). Muscle mass was measured using ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).
resultsBaseline characteristics and comorbidities showed no statistical differences between the two groups. Initial measurements of muscles showed no significant differences between the groups in rectus femoris thickness, total anterior thigh muscle thickness, cross-sectional area, echogenicity, or in-body skeletal muscle mass at baseline and 7 days. However, at 14 days, significant differences emerged. The rehabilitation group had greater rectus femoris thickness (1.42 cm vs. 0.81 cm,
conclusionsOur findings suggest that rehabilitation in critically ill patients is associated with a slower rate of muscle loss, particularly in the cross-sectional area of the rectus femoris muscle, which may be beneficial for patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.