Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517268›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Impact of Natural Phytosanitary Product Residuals on Yeast Fermentation Performance and Wine Composition.

Natascia Bartolozzi, Francesco Maioli, Monica Picchi, Valentina Civa, Valentina Canuti, Paola Domizio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natascia BartolozziDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.
Francesco MaioliDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-4643
Monica PicchiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.
Valentina CivaDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-2207-6493
Valentina CanutiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8345-8257
Paola DomizioDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental, and Forestry Sciences and Technologies (DAGRI), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 18, 50144 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-4929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although phytosanitary treatments are necessary to protect grapes from parasitic diseases, consumers are increasingly concerned about the use of synthetic phytosanitary products and their possible residues in wine. Pre-harvest phytosanitary treatments are often inevitable, and consequently downtime is required to avoid possible residues on the grapes. Instead, natural phytosanitary products, such as essential oil (EO)-based products, can be applied close to the harvest without specific restrictions, with results that are not only technically convenient but also more attractive for the consumers. Because of the high antimicrobial activity of EO products, in the present study we evaluated the effect of different residual amounts of two new EO-based phytosanitary products on the alcoholic fermentation and the chemical composition of the final fermented products. In particular, two EO-based new formulations, exploitable in organic viticulture management, were evaluated. Increasing concentrations of each formulation were tested during laboratory scale fermentations and in comparison with synthetic and natural commercial phytosanitary products. Growth and fermentation kinetics of a commercial yeast strain of

Indexed as

alcoholic fermentationBotrytis cinereaessential oilsfermentation kineticsnew fungicidesorganic winepesticidewine quality

Identifiers

PMID39517268
PMCPMC11545603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.