Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39517106›Full record

ReviewCell transplantation

Raising the Bar: Progress in 3D-Printed Hybrid Bone Scaffolds for Clinical Applications: A Review.

Ahsan Riaz Khan, Navdeep Singh Grewal, Zhang Jun, Ferdous M O Tawfiq, Fairouz Tchier, Rana Muhammad Zulqarnain, Hai-Jun Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahsan Riaz KhanDepartment of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9683-4728
Navdeep Singh GrewalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo, India.
Zhang JunResearch Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Ferdous M O TawfiqMathematics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fairouz TchierMathematics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rana Muhammad ZulqarnainDepartment of Mathematics, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS Thandalam, Chennai, India.
Hai-Jun ZhangDepartment of Interventional and Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to bones resulting from trauma and tumors poses a significant challenge to human health. Consequently, current research in bone damage healing centers on developing three-dimensional (3D) scaffolding materials that facilitate and enhance the regeneration of fractured bone tissues. In this context, the careful selection of materials and preparation processes is essential for creating demanding scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. This is done to optimize the regeneration of fractured bones. This study comprehensively analyses the latest scientific advancements and difficulties in developing scaffolds for bone tissue creation. Initially, we clarified the composition and process by which bone tissue repairs itself. The review summarizes the primary uses of materials, both inorganic and organic, in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. In addition, we present a comprehensive study of the most recent advancements in the mainstream techniques used to prepare scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. We also examine the distinct advantages of each method in great detail. This article thoroughly examines potential paths and obstacles in bone tissue engineering scaffolds for clinical applications.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBone RegenerationHumans3D-implantsbiocompatibilityclinical applicationsregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID39517106
PMCPMC11549696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.