ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2024
Effects of famotidine use during pregnancy: an observational cohort study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Maternal Mosapride Citrate Hydrate Exposure During the First Trimester: Assessing Risks for Congenital Anomalies.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamotidine, a histamine2-receptor antagonist (H2Ras), is widely used to treat and prevent gastrointestinal symptoms during pregnancy. Although several studies have reported the use of H2Ras during pregnancy, limited data on famotidine were included in these reports. Therefore, we analyzed pregnancy outcome data to evaluate the effects of famotidine use during pregnancy on the fetus.
methodsPregnancy outcome data were used for females enrolled in two Japanese facilities that provided counseling on drug use during pregnancy between April 1988 and December 2017. For the primary endpoint, the incidence of congenital malformations was calculated from the data of live birth to pregnant women who took famotidine (n = 330) or drugs considered to exert no teratogenic risk (control, n = 1,407) during the first trimester of pregnancy. Considering secondary endpoints, the incidence of obstetric outcomes, including preterm delivery, was calculated from data on the use of famotidine (n = 347) and controls (n = 1,476) during the entire pregnancy. The crude odds ratios (cORs) for the incidence of congenital malformations were calculated using univariate logistic regression analysis, with the control group used as the reference. Adjusted ORs (aORs) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for various other factors.
resultsThe incidences of congenital malformations in the famotidine and control groups were 3.9% and 2.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the famotidine and control groups (cOR: 1.40 [95% CI:0.68-2.71], aOR: 1.06 [95% CI:0.51-2.16]). Conversely, the preterm delivery rates were 8.1% and 3.8% in the famotidine and control groups, respectively, indicating a significant difference (cOR: 2.00 [95% CI:1.20-3.27]). However, the multivariate analysis eliminated famotidine use as a confounding factor.
conclusionsThis observational cohort study revealed that exposure to famotidine during the first trimester of pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations in infants. Although a higher rate of preterm delivery was detected in famotidine users when compared with controls, this could be attributed to confounding factors, such as complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.