Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516912›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2024

COVID-19 public health restrictions and opioid overdoes: a summative content analysis of emergency medical services records in three Texas counties.

S Scott Graham, Nandini Sharma, Tristin B Hooker, Kimberlyn Harrison, Kasey Claborn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S Scott GrahamThe Addiction Research Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, 3001 Lake Austin Blvd., Suite 1.204, Austin, TX, 78703, USA. ssg@utexas.edu.
Nandini SharmaThe Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, 300 W. Dean Keeton (A0900), Austin, TX, 78712-1069, USA.
Tristin B HookerThe Department of Rhetoric and Writing, The University of Texas at Austin, 208 W. 21st St, STOP B5500, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Kimberlyn HarrisonThe Department of Rhetoric and Writing, The University of Texas at Austin, 208 W. 21st St, STOP B5500, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Kasey ClabornThe Addiction Research Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, 3001 Lake Austin Blvd., Suite 1.204, Austin, TX, 78703, USA.

Funding

Adherence Intervention for HIV-infected Drug UsersK23DA039037 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI CLABORN, KASEY R · 2015 to 2019
$919k
NIDA NIH HHS K23DA039037Texas Health and Human Services Commission 1H79TI081729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the broad recognition of increased U.S. opioid overdose (OOD) rates between 2020 and 2021, media, public health, and healthcare organizations have raised significant concerns over the emergence of a simultaneous COVID-19-opioid "twindemic." Research in this area has explored the possible relationships between negative externalities associated with the pandemic and/or COVID-19 public health interventions and increased risks for opioid use and overdose alongside diminished outcomes following OOD events.

methodsThe study offers a summative content analysis of Emergency Medical Service (EMS) responses to opioid overdose (OOD) events before and after the institution of COVID-19 restrictions. Specifically, the study investigates three Texas counties to evaluate changing OOD rates, patient demographics, and OOD event features. The analysis uses a previously validated machine learning tool to identify OOD events and conducted a summative content analysis of identified events.

resultsA total of 1170 OOD responses events were identified in the three-county dataset. This includes 874 in Travis County, 242 in El Paso County, and 54 in Williamson County. Each county experienced modest changes in EMS calls for OOD events between the pre-restriction and public health restriction time periods. Travis County's OOD event rate declined from 454 to 420. El Paso's increased from 103 to 139, and Williamson County's increased from 23 to 31. These changes were not significant as percentage of possible OOD events or based on by-month comparison. The notable differences between pre-restriction and public health restriction periods were significant decreases in documentation of patient race/ethnicity in Travis and Williamson Counties, significant decreases in housing insecurity and use alone in Travis County, and an increase in transport refusal after treatment in the field in Travis County.

conclusionsUltimately the results presented here problematize prevailing analyses about the so-called opioid-COVID-19 "twindemic." The data further support emerging trends about substantial geographic variation and show some ways that COVID-19 mitigation measures may have improved conditions for some populations, particularly in terms of housing security. Additionally, the results presented here indicate that further attention should be paid to the effects of first responder stress on documentation quality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency Medical ServicesOpiate OverdoseAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPublic HealthTexasYoung AdultCOVID-19EpidemicOpioidsOverdose

Identifiers

PMID39516912
PMCPMC11545770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.