Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516887›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

What is known about persons with co-occurring problems' experiences with supported housing, recovery, and health promotion? A scoping review.

Unn Elisabeth Hammervold, Silje Gytri, Marianne Storm, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Hildegunn Sagvaag

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Unn Elisabeth HammervoldDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NO- 4036, Norway. unn.hammervold@uis.no.
Silje GytriDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NO- 4036, Norway.
Marianne StormDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NO- 4036, Norway.
Torgeir Gilje LidDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NO- 4036, Norway.
Hildegunn SagvaagDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, NO- 4036, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaving a home is the foundation of most people's lives. People with co-occurring substance use and mental health problems may experience challenges in acquiring and keeping housing. Many also have major health challenges. Supported housing is the subject of increasing interest, but there seems to be a lack of studies exploring supported housing's potential for facilitating recovery and health promotion. Therefore, a scoping review was performed to answer our review question: What is known in the literature about the experiences of persons with co-occurring substance use and mental health problems with supported housing, including experiences of recovery and health promotion?

methodsSystematic searches were conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Social Services Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus, and Oria, and Idunn.no databases. The search terms were derived from the population, concepts, and context. The search for grey literature was conducted in various Norwegian sources.

resultsForty studies were included: 7 with quantitative design, 28 with qualitative design and 5 with mixed methods design. The studies were from Canada, Ireland, Norway, Scotland, and the USA. The review identified four themes related to tenants' experiences with supported housing: 1)The importance of a permanent and safe home; 2) Housing's importance for physical health; 3) A shoulder to lean on - the importance of relationships and support; 4) the value of choice and independence. Factors that may influence physical health were poorly represented.

conclusionsLong-term housing and safety are prerequisites for recovery for people with co-occurring problems. Programmes such as Housing First and Assertive Community Teams, especially, were experienced to support recovery. Autonomy was valued, including access to individual and respectful support from service providers when needed. Supported housing may be a health-promoting arena, especially in relation to mental health. More attention should be given to how service providers can support tenants to protect their physical health, especially related to nutrition, meals and communal cooking. Further research is needed to tailor optimal services and support for people with co-occurring problems, including balancing support and autonomy with the aim of promoting health and recovery. Peer specialists' contributions to supported housing are scarce and need further development.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMental DisordersSubstance-Related DisordersHousingHumansCo-occurring substance use and mental health problemsHealth promotionRecoveryScoping reviewSupported housing

Identifiers

PMID39516887
PMCPMC11549848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.