Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516852›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2024

Corporate activities that influence population health: a scoping review and qualitative synthesis to develop the HEALTH-CORP typology.

Raquel Burgess, Kate Nyhan, Nicholas Freudenberg, Yusuf Ransome

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Commercial Determinants of Latinx Health: A Scoping Review of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in the USA.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Do ESG Frameworks Capture Corporate Health Impacts? An Analysis of the Food and Beverage Industry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raquel BurgessDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America. burgess.raq@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-366X
Kate NyhanHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5397-2303
Nicholas FreudenbergDepartment of Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY Graduate School of Public Health & Health Policy, 55 W 125th Street, New York City, 10027, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9500-1924
Yusuf RansomeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4170-2001

Funding

CIHR Doctoral Foreign Study Award (DFSA)Yale Graduate Student Assembly Conference Travel FellowshipYale School of Public Health, Yale University Support for conference travel
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe concept of the commercial determinants of health (CDH) is used to study the actions of commercial entities and the political and economic systems, structures, and norms that enable these actions and ultimately influence population health and health inequity. The aim of this study was to develop a typology that describes the diverse set of activities through which commercial entities influence population health and health equity across industries.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review to identify articles using CDH terms (n = 116) published prior to September 13, 2022 that discuss corporate activities that can influence population health and health equity across 16 industries. We used the qualitative constant comparative method to inductively code descriptions and examples of corporate activities within these articles, arrange the activities into descriptive domains, and generate an overarching typology.

resultsThe resulting Corporate Influences on Population Health (HEALTH-CORP) typology identifies 70 corporate activities that can influence health across industries, which are categorized into seven domains of corporate influence (i.e., political practices, preference and perception shaping practices, corporate social responsibility practices, economic practices, products & services, employment practices, and environmental practices). We present a model that situates these domains based on their proximity to health outcomes and identify five population groups (i.e., consumers, workers, disadvantaged groups, vulnerable groups, and local communities) to consider when evaluating corporate health impacts. DISCUSSION: The HEALTH-CORP typology facilitates an understanding of the diverse set of corporate activities that can influence population health and the population groups affected by these activities. We discuss how the HEALTH-CORP model and typology could be used to support the work of policy makers and civil society actors, as well as provide the conceptual infrastructure for future surveillance efforts to monitor corporate practices that affect health across industries. Finally, we discuss two gaps in the CDH literature that we identified based on our findings: the lack of research on environmental and employment practices and a dearth of scholarship dedicated to investigating corporate practices in low- and middle-income countries. We propose potential avenues to address these gaps (e.g., aligning CDH monitoring with other occupational health monitoring initiatives).

Indexed as

Population HealthCommerceHealth EquityHumansIndustryQualitative ResearchSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID39516852
PMCPMC11549802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.