Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516829›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

DPYD genotype-guided dose personalisation for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy prescribing in solid organ cancer patients in Australia: GeneScreen 5-FU study protocol.

Cassandra White, Hannah Wardill, Christine Paul, Timothy Price, Christos Karapetis, Mark Nalder, Matthew E Burge, Ann Thomas, Chris Oldmeadow, Daniel Barker and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Total neoadjuvant therapy in early-onset rectal cancer: A multicentre prospective cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Cassandra WhiteUniversity of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. cassandra.white10@uon.edu.au.
Hannah WardillSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Christine PaulUniversity of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Timothy PriceThe Queen Elizabeth Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Christos KarapetisFlinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Mark NalderRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Matthew E BurgeRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Ann ThomasHunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Chris OldmeadowHunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Daniel BarkerHunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Laura C EdneyFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health; Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.
Janet CollerSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Joanne BowenSchool of Biomedicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
Cheri OstroffUniversity of South Australia, Centre for Workplace Excellence, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Bruce CheekAustralasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (Consumer Panel), Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Mel CarlsonUniversity of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Trumaine RankmoreHunter Medical Research Institute, Lot 1, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Adnan NagrialWestern Sydney Local Health District, Westmead, NSW, 2148, Australia.
Stephen ClarkeNorthern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
Lorraine ChantrillIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Stephen AcklandUniversity of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Rodney J ScottUniversity of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluoropyrimidine (FP) chemotherapies are commonly prescribed for upper and lower gastrointestinal, breast and head and neck malignancies. Over 16,000 people with cancer require FP chemotherapies per annum in Australia. Between 10 and 40% patients experience grade 3-4 (≥ G3) toxicities that require hospital-based management ± intensive care admission. Approximately 1% of patients die secondary to FP toxicities. Prospective screening for DPYD gene variants (encoding the key enzyme for FP catabolism) can identify patients at risk of ≥ G3 toxicity and allow for dose adjustment prior to first FP exposure. Evidence supports this as a cost-effective method of improving patient safety and reducing healthcare burden internationally; however, no Australian data confirms its feasibility on a large scale.

methodThis investigator-led, single-arm study will determine large scale feasibility of prospective DPYD genotyping, confirming patient safety and cost-effectiveness within the Australian health care system. 5000 patients aged 18 years and older with solid organ cancers requiring FP chemotherapy will be consented and genotyped prior to commencing treatment, and early toxicity (within 60 days) post-FP exposure will be determined. Toxicity data for DPYD variant carriers who have dose adjustments will be compared to the wild-type cohort and historical cohorts of carriers who did not undergo genotyping prior to FP exposure, and prospective variant carriers who do not undergo dose-adjustment. Prevalence of the four standard DPYD gene variants will be confirmed in an Australian population. Additionally, health economic analysis, implementation research via semi-structured interviews of patients and clinicians, and feasibility of UGT1A1 genotyping will be conducted. DISCUSSION: This study will determine the prevalence of DPYD gene variant status in Australia and its impact on FP-induced toxicity among Australians with cancer. Feasibility and cost-effectiveness for Australian health care system will be estimated to support national roll-out of prospective DPYD genotyping prior to FP administration. Additionally, feasibility will be confirmed with the intention of including UGT1A1 in future pharmacogenomic panels to aid chemotherapy prescribing.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Cancer Trials Registry on 13th Dec 2023, ACTRN12623001301651.

Indexed as

Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilGenotypeNeoplasmsAustraliaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrecision MedicineProspective StudiesDihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)FluorouracilDihydropyrimidine dehydrogenaseDPYDFluoropyrimidineIrinotecanPharmacogenomicsUGT1A1

Identifiers

PMID39516829
PMCPMC11549825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.