ArticleHereditas2024
Serum vitamin C levels and risk of osteoporosis: results from a cross-sectional study and Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Hereditas, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into vitamin C in musculoskeletal physiology and disorders: mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic value of LncRNA SNHG16 for osteoporotic fractures and its potential regulation of fracture healing.Hereditas · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of vitamin C as an antioxidant in guarding against osteoporosis in adults is still debated. This research employs both a cross-sectional study and a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore how serum vitamin C levels correlate with the incidence of osteoporosis among adults.
methodsIn this study, we utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database for the years 2003-2006, and 2017-2018 to conduct both a cross-sectional analysis and MR to investigate the relationship between serum vitamin C levels and the risk of osteoporosis in adults. We adjusted our analyses for essential demographic and lifestyle variables, and applied logistic regression techniques. Genetic determinants of vitamin C levels were analyzed through MR, using methods like inverse-variance weighted (IVW) and MR-Egger to assess causality. Statistical computations were carried out in R, incorporating visual tools such as restricted cubic spline curves (RCS) and forest plots to clarify the dose-response dynamics and variations across different subgroups. This study was approved by the NCHS Ethics Review Board, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
resultsIn our investigation, we analyzed data from 3,940 participants, among whom 291 were diagnosed with osteoporosis. The logistic regression analysis of serum vitamin C quartiles did not indicate a significant trend. The most adjusted model showed a slight, albeit inconsistent, protective effect in the highest quartile (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47-0.99, P = 0.22). Mendelian randomization, employing methods such as IVW, reinforced the absence of a significant causal relationship between serum vitamin C levels and osteoporosis risk (IVW OR = 1.000, 95% CI: 0.999-1.001, P = 0.601).Subgroup analyses, visualized through forest plots and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves, supported the primary findings, showing no significant effects or interactions between vitamin C levels and osteoporosis risk across different demographic and lifestyle subgroups. The RCS analysis particularly highlighted a lack of significant non-linear relationships between serum vitamin C concentration and the odds of osteoporosis (P for nonlinear = 0.840).
conclusionsThe cross-sectional study revealed that higher serum vitamin C levels do not consistently correlate with a reduced risk of osteoporosis. Meanwhile, the Mendelian randomization analysis confirmed that there is no genetic evidence to suggest a causal relationship between vitamin C levels and osteoporosis risk. Recent research highlights the polygenic nature of osteoporosis, with genetic predispositions playing a significant role in disease risk. The relationship between serum vitamin C and osteoporosis requires further research. This suggests the need for further investigation into the connection between vitamin C and bone health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.