Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516788›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Nature-based approaches: a mixed methods study of facilitators and barriers to implementation in CAMHS.

Siobhan B Mitchell, Beth Chapman, Rachel Hayes, Hélène Bonnici, Hazel Banks, Silvana Mareva, Rebecca Hardwick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siobhan B MitchellNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK. s.b.mitchell@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4085-3898
Beth ChapmanCornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Cornwall, UK.
Rachel HayesNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK.
Hélène BonniciNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, UK.
Hazel BanksNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Silvana MarevaFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rebecca HardwickNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing evidence that spending time with or in nature can be beneficial for health and wellbeing. Emerging evidence suggests potential benefits for staff and service users in healthcare settings, yet little is known about how to put Nature-based approaches (NBAs) into practice within the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) setting. The CAMHS Goes Wild project in Southwest England aimed to explore the implementation of NBAs within CAMHS, examining staff attitudes and understanding to identify potential benefits and challenges through a mixed methods study.

methodsThe study involved three phases of data collection: an online survey with two waves, the first wave prior to the training, and the second four months post-training, and semi-structured interviews. Data collection was designed to fit around NatureWell training, attended by sixty-four CAMHS staff, which took place alongside the study. All participants were sampled from one NHS Trust and the study was open to both those who had attended the NatureWell training and those who had not. Data were synthesised to produce an understanding of staff attitudes towards NBAs and perceived barriers and facilitators to the implementation of this approach.

resultsNinety-seven staff responded to the wave 1 survey and 57 responded to the wave 2 survey. Fourteen staff members were interviewed. Data synthesis generated three themes: Tension between the culture of CAMHS and NBAs (Theme 1) and the need for buy-in and governance support (Theme 2). Theme three described the potential benefits of NBAs for staff and service users in CAMHS and is presented in a separate paper. The first two themes are presented in this paper.

conclusionsThe implementation of NBAs in mental health service settings for CYP presents both significant challenges and opportunities. Our findings suggest multiple barriers to implementation, often in the form of organisational or cultural factors, such as the risk averse nature of the service. Our work also elucidates several potential facilitators which may address or mitigate some of these barriers. These potential enablers, such as harnessing the role of firsthand experience, warrant further exploration in the implementation of NBAs in CAMHS.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental Health ServicesAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesAdultChildChild Health ServicesEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNatureQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesBarriersChildren and young peopleFacilitatorsImplementationMental health servicesNature-based approaches

Identifiers

PMID39516788
PMCPMC11549852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.