Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516784›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Development and accuracy of an artificial intelligence model for predicting the progression of hip osteoarthritis using plain radiographs and clinical data: a retrospective study.

Ryo Hidaka, Kenta Matsuda, Takashi Igari, Shu Takeuchi, Yuichi Imoto, Satoshi Yagi, Hirotaka Kawano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryo HidakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itahashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan. qqdr59qd@yahoo.co.jp.
Kenta MatsudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itahashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Takashi IgariTechnology Administration Supervision, FUJISOFT INCORPORATED, 1-1 Sakuragi-cho, Naka-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 231-8008, Japan.
Shu TakeuchiTechnology Administration Supervision, FUJISOFT INCORPORATED, 1-1 Sakuragi-cho, Naka-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 231-8008, Japan.
Yuichi ImotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itahashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.
Satoshi YagiTechnology Administration Supervision, FUJISOFT INCORPORATED, 1-1 Sakuragi-cho, Naka-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, 231-8008, Japan.
Hirotaka KawanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itahashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-8606, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting the progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA) remains challenging, and no reliable predictive method has been established. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict hip OA progression via plain radiographs and patient data and to determine its accuracy.

methodsThis retrospective study utilized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of consecutive patients with hip OA who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Radiographs diagnosed with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade 0-2 were extracted from 361 patients and 1697 images. This AI model was developed to predict whether OA would progress from KL grade 0-2 to KL grade ≥ 3 within n years (n = 3, 4, 5). A gradient-boosting decision tree approach was utilized according to feature extractions obtained by a convolutional neural network from radiographs and patient data (height, body weight, sex, age, and KL grade given by an orthopedic surgeon) with five-fold cross-validation. The model performance was assessed using accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsThe mean accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of our prediction model were, respectively, 81.8%, 88.0%, 66.7%, and 0.836 for 3 years; 79.8%, 85.0%, 71.6%, and 0.836 for 4 years; and 78.5%, 80.4%, 76.9%, and 0.846 for 5 years.

conclusionsThe proposed AI model performed adequately in predicting hip OA progression and may be clinically applicable with additional datasets and validation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDisease ProgressionOsteoarthritis, HipAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkDeep learningHipKellgren–Lawrence classificationMachine learningOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID39516784
PMCPMC11546505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.