Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516768›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2024

Neurobiological effects and mechanisms of magnetic fields: a review from 2000 to 2023.

Xuejia Wang, Yumeng Ye, Hongyan Zuo, Yang Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Magnetically-Induced Suppression of Oxidative Stress Prevents Venous Thrombosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuejia Wang *Department of Experimental Pathology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yumeng Ye *Department of Experimental Pathology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hongyan ZuoDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China. zuohy2005@126.com.
Yang LiDepartment of Experimental Pathology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, China. leeyoung109@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic fields are widely used in medical diagnostics because of their superior non-invasive properties. In addition, with the widespread use of magnetic fields in transportation and other areas, their potential hazards to human health and the assessment of their safety have attracted considerable attention. The effects of magnetic fields on living organisms have a long history. The biological effects of magnetic field exposure in mice and rats depend on the magnetic field strength, exposure time, and direction; depending on these and potentially other factors, magnetic fields can cause a series of neurobiological effects. We reviewed global research on the neurobiological effects of magnetic fields from recent years to provide an overview and insights into the underlying mechanisms. This review focuses on the biological effects of static and dynamic magnetic fields of different frequencies and intensities on animals and nerve cells and their mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsAnimalsHumansMiceRatsAnxietyDepressionEmotional behaviorLearning and memoryMagnetic fieldsNeurobiological effects

Identifiers

PMID39516768
PMCPMC11545338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.