Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39516762›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Weight-based disparities in perinatal care: quantitative findings of respect, autonomy, mistreatment, and body mass index in a national Canadian survey.

Nisha Malhotra, Cecilia M Jevitt, Kathrin Stoll, Wanda Phillips-Beck, Saraswathi Vedam, RESPCCT Study Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nisha MalhotraDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. nisha.malhotra@ubc.ca.
Cecilia M JevittDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. cecilia.jevitt@ubc.ca.
Kathrin StollDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Wanda Phillips-BeckUniversity of Manitoba, Indigenous Research Chair in Nursing, First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada.
Saraswathi VedamDepartment of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
RESPCCT Study Team

Funding

CIHR F17-04002, F23-03996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQualitative studies document episodes of weight-related disrespectful care, particularly for people with high body mass index (BMI ≥ 30) and reveal implicit and explicit biases in health care providers. No large quantitative studies document the pervasiveness of weight stigma or if experiences change with increasing BMI.

methodsThe multi-stakeholder RESPCCT study team designed and distributed a cross-sectional survey on the experiences of perinatal services in all provinces and territories in Canada. From July 2020 to August 2021, participants who had a pregnancy within ten years responded to closed and open-ended questions. Chi square analysis assessed differences in mean scores derived from three patient-reported experience measures of autonomy (MADM), respect (MOR), and mistreatment (MIST). Controlling for socio-demographic factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis explored relationships between different BMI categories and respectful care.

resultsOf 4,815 Canadians who participated, 3,280 with a BMI of ≥ 18.5 completed all the questions. Pre-pregnancy BMI was significantly associated with race/ethnicity, income sufficiency, and education but not with age. Individuals with higher BMIs were more likely to experience income insufficiency, have lower levels of education, and more frequently self-identified as Indigenous or White. Those with BMI ≥ 35 exhibited notably higher odds of reduced autonomy (MADM) scores, with an unadjusted odds ratio of 1.62 and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.45 compared to individuals with a normal weight. Individuals with BMIs of 25-25.9, 30-34.9, and ≥ 35 exhibited odds of falling into the lower tercile of respect (MOR) scores of 1.34, 1.51, and 2.04, respectively (p < .01). The odds of reporting higher rates of mistreatment (top 33% MIST scores) increased as BMI increased.

conclusionsWhile socio-demographic factors like race and income play significant roles in influencing perinatal care experiences, BMI remains a critical determinant even after accounting for these variables. This study reveals pronounced disparities in the provision of respectful perinatal care to pregnant individuals with higher BMIs in Canada. Data suggest that those with higher BMIs face disrespect, discrimination, and mistreatment. Identification of implicit and explicit weight bias may give providers insight enabling them to provide more respectful care.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHealthcare DisparitiesPerinatal CarePersonal AutonomyAdultCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyRespectSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultHealthcare disparitiesHigh body mass indexMistreatment in perinatal careObesityPatient-reported experiencePREMsWeight biasWeight stigma

Identifiers

PMID39516762
PMCPMC11549742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.